Bid Engine
Back to the drafting queue

Schedule 2.2 · Assurance and compliance · 20% of the score

Set out how you will meet the DEFCON 658 obligations and evidence continued compliance.

Drafted by the governance agent using Control mapping prompt v6, against the themes extracted from the tender pack and the buyer's own published content. J. Okonjo owns the acceptance.

Agent draft

1104 of 1200 words

Compliance with DEFCON 658 is not asserted, it is mapped. Every obligation is bound to a control, an accountable owner and an artefact, and the mapping is regenerated whenever the guidance changes.

Assurance evidence is produced as a by-product of delivery rather than assembled for audit. Each agent action writes an immutable entry recording the inputs, the evidence used and the person who accepted the output.

Independent review runs adversarially against our own answers before submission, and the same mechanism continues in service as a quarterly assurance pass.

96 words of allowance remain. Unused allowance on a scored question is unclaimed marks.

Reviewer decision

Named reviewer J. Okonjo
In review

Evidence behind the draft

Confidence 91%
  • Signal Fabric · guidance, freshness scored

    All citations dated inside the current cycle.

  • Audit log · agent attribution

    Replayable decision trail.

Themes this answer carries

  • Auditable assurance over the whole delivery

    Theme score 71 · prove it

Agent flags

0 open

The adversarial pass raised nothing on this answer.

Next draft. Schedule 2.3 · Mobilisation